Sign In
Airforce-Magazine.com: Online journal of the Air Force Association
Article Collections
Editorials
Airpower Classics
Perspectives (Articles by Topic)
Verbatim
The Chart Page
The Keeper File
Valor
Enola Gay Controversy
Advertising
Media Kit
Print Advertising
Online Advertising
 
Send Letter to Editor
Reprint Permission
About Us
Subscription Manager
How to Join AFA

“Staunch Advocate” 

“Staunch Advocate”: Air Force Secretary Michael Wynne received warm praise Friday from the man who compelled him to resign. At a farewell parade and awards ceremony at the feet of the Air Force Memorial just outside Washington, Gates called Wynne a “staunch advocate” for Air Force people, adding that in all their dealings, “he has never swerved from that mission.” Gates also touted Wynne’s contributions to national security in Pentagon acquisition jobs and in industry, where, as a General Dynamics executive, he helped bring the F-16 fighter and M1 Abrams tank into service. He noted that Wynne is “taking responsibility for systemic problems in one of the Air Force’s most sensitive missions” and praised his “willingness, at great personal cost, to live by the same standards of accountability he has instilled in so many people over so many years.” Wynne offered his resignation on June 5 after a Pentagon report found that the Air Force had “lost focus” on its nuclear mission. Wynne, in his own remarks, asserted that “the Air Force is this nation’s asymmetric advantage” and said that during his two and a half year-tenure, “I believe we’ve laid a convincing argument” for recapitalization of the Air Force’s fleet of aircraft, which Wynne noted is older than the Navy’s fleet of ships. He called Gates a strong Defense Secretary with a “passion for winning the fight” of today, and noted his own passion for “preparing the force” for future challenges. Chief of Staff Gen. T. Michael Moseley presented Wynne with an award for exceptional service. The citation recognized Wynne for having “reshaped the national discussion” about modernizing the Air Force after “years of deferred recapitalization” had caused the service’s technological edge to “erode.”
—John A. Tirpak  
6/23/2008 
Verbatim

No Dog, Just Concern
"You know it concerns me that we keep hearing, 'Well this is something that the military doesn't want. They didn't ask for,' and all that. Then I go over there [Southwest Asia theater], and that's not their attitude at all. They have needs over there. Our lift capacity is in dire straights. … Now on the F-22—just yesterday we read about the T-50 … a fifth generation [fighter] that the Russians have. … I'm concerned about this. And I guess, you know, if we're down to 187 F-22s, and I think out of that only—what 120 are actually combat ready and used for combat. … I look at our committee—the Senate Armed Services Committee—and on these two vehicles I mentioned—the F-22 and the C-17—in Oklahoma. I don't have a dog in that fight. We don't have any parochial interest there. But it's the capability that we're going to need."
—Sen. James Inhofe (R-Okla.), speaking during the Senate Armed Services Committee hearing on the Fiscal 2011 defense budget, Feb. 2, 2010.

Verbatim

Taming Expectations
"Every QDR disappoints those who look for radical reallocation of resources. The current fiscal environment is compounding that trend."
—Jim Thomas, vice president for studies at the Center for Strategic and Budgetary Assessments, briefing reporters in Washington, D.C., Jan. 26, 2010. 

Sponsored Links

airforce-magazine.com material is under copyright by the Air Force Association. All rights reserved.

The Air Force Association, 1501 Lee Highway, Arlington,VA 22209-1198