Sign In
Airforce-Magazine.com: Online journal of the Air Force Association
Article Collections
Editorials
Airpower Classics
Perspectives (Articles by Topic)
Verbatim
The Chart Page
The Keeper File
Valor
Enola Gay Controversy
Advertising
Media Kit
Print Advertising
Online Advertising
 
Send Letter to Editor
Reprint Permission
About Us
Subscription Manager
How to Join AFA

Pentagon Tries to Meet Demand for Predators: 

Pentagon Tries to Meet Demand for Predators: The Office of the Secretary of Defense is pushing the Air Force to deploy nearly all of its MQ-1 Predator unmanned aerial vehicles to support ground forces in Afghanistan and Iraq, the Los Angeles Times reported March 21. While the Air Force is doing all it can to be supportive, service officials warn that placing more demands on the already overtaxed Predator fleet would have serious long-term implications, essentially breaking its back, the newspaper said. The pressure being exerted by Defense Secretary Robert Gates to put more Predators in combat stems from the view that the Pentagon’s intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance community is still operating on a “business as usual” basis despite the urgency that the Army has for capabilities like the Predator to hunt insurgents, find roadside bombs, and, generally, save US lives, the Times said. The Air Force has been accelerating its efforts to get Predators in the field, upping the number of simultaneous combat air patrols that it can provide. But Gates has reportedly wanted even more, prompting Gen. Michael Moseley, Air Force Chief of Staff, to submit to him an “all in” plan that would have provided 36 CAPs to the combatant commander in the Middle East/Near East region by August—there are currently 22, the Times said—but at the cost of shutting down Predator training operations. The plan was debated in January, but not adopted, the newspaper said. Even without that drastic measure, the Air Force is still struggling today to keep its Predator operator slots filled, having to extend the rotations of MQ-1 pilots well beyond their scheduled tours, the newspaper said.
 
3/24/2008 
Verbatim

Too High a Risk?
"This issue is not about contractor 'A' or contractor 'B.' The issues is that we do not believe that it is prudent for up to 80 to 90 percent of the fighter fleet to be dependent on a single engine type, provided by one manufacturer. Being tied to one engine is too high an operational risk to take."
—Rep. Neil Abercrombie (D-Hawaii), explaining why his House Armed Services Air and Land Forces Subcommittee had added funds to the 2010 defense budget to cover continued development of an alternate engine for the F-35, committee markup session, June 16, 2009.

Verbatim

You Betcha
"Your decision to terminate the acquisition of the C-17s, the F- 22s, the DDG-1000, and the Future Combat System vehicles—we have concerns that it may send the wrong signal to our friends and our potential aggressors that we are reducing our capability. It may also have a long-term impact on our defense industrial base. It may diminish our capacity to provide deterrents and reduce our strength that we provide to our allies. We hope that this is not the consequence, but some of us are concerned."
—Sen. Daniel Inouye (D-Hawaii), parting remarks to Defense Secretary Robert Gates and Adm. Michael Mullen, Joint Chiefs Chairman, during a Senate Appropriations Defense Subcommittee hearing, June 9, 2009.

Sponsored Links

airforce-magazine.com material is under copyright by the Air Force Association. All rights reserved.

The Air Force Association, 1501 Lee Highway, Arlington,VA 22209-1198