Sign In
Airforce-Magazine.com: Online journal of the Air Force Association
Article Collections
Editorials
Airpower Classics
Perspectives (Articles by Topic)
Verbatim
The Chart Page
The Keeper File
Valor
Enola Gay Controversy
Advertising
Media Kit
Print Advertising
Online Advertising
 
Send Letter to Editor
Reprint Permission
About Us
Subscription Manager
How to Join AFA

Buffing Up: 

Buffing Up: Gen John Corley, commander of Air Combat Command, said March 27 he favors increasing the number of B-52s that USAF maintains in the same configuration for combat and training from 56 to 76. Speaking to reporters in Washington, D.C., Corley said the impetus for the move, which would give USAF 44 combat-coded B-52s vice the 32 that it now has, is the desire to be able to assign B-52 units solely the nuclear mission for extended periods of training and combat availability. Having more B-52s would provide more flexibility to do that as well as enable the Air Force still to have enough B-52s available to combatant commanders for conventional missions, he said. “By putting ourselves into this rotation, I think it gets us properly postured,” he said. “You can envision an environment where someone moves into a spin up, solely focused on the nuclear enterprise for a period of two months and they go into the normal AEF rotation of about four months where they are focused exclusively on only one thing: nuclear. And then they come off of that and rotate back into their conventional role.” This idea comes in the aftermath of the errant transfer of nuclear weapons last August aboard a B-52. (For more read Convergence)
 
3/28/2008 
Verbatim

To Be Clear
“Just like in my business, the issues that go badly get all of the attention. I think, to be clear with you, there are many things that are managed well every day in the Air Force.”
—John Young, Pentagon acquisition executive, speaking to defense reporters on the state of Air Force acquisition, Washington, D.C., Nov. 20, 2008.

Verbatim

F-22 Options
“They have two choices. On January 21st, they can obligate the $90 million and decide there's some chance ... that they will buy the airplanes and they'd rather preserve the option to buy [them] at no additional cost to the taxpayer. Or, they could chose not to obligate the $90 million and accept that they still have a decision to be made between then and March 1st. But that decision may cost the taxpayer more money.”
—DOD acquisition czar John Young on how releasing only $50 million of the $140 million authorized by Congress to keep the F-22 production line active until March 2009 still preserves options for the new Administration, Capitol Hill, Nov. 19, 2008.

Sponsored Links

airforce-magazine.com material is under copyright by the Air Force Association. All rights reserved.

The Air Force Association, 1501 Lee Highway, Arlington,VA 22209-1198