Sign In
Airforce-Magazine.com: Online journal of the Air Force Association
Article Collections
Editorials
Airpower Classics
Perspectives (Articles by Topic)
Verbatim
The Chart Page
The Keeper File
Valor
Enola Gay Controversy
Advertising
Media Kit
Print Advertising
Online Advertising
 
Send Letter to Editor
Reprint Permission
About Us
Subscription Manager
How to Join AFA

A10 Countdown 

A10 Countdown: The new directorate on the Air Staff that will coordinate the Air Force's nuclear activities, enterprise-wide, will stand up formally on Nov. 1, Air Force spokeswoman Liz Aptekar tells the Daily Report. The Air Force leadership announced the creation of the office, designated A10, after the service's senior-level nuclear summit in September. Its purpose will be to provide a “singular focus on nuclear matters in the Air Force headquarters,” the service said. It is one of the numerous cultural, organizational, and policy changes that the Air Force is undertaking to restore it nuclear stewardship and reinvigorate emphasis on the nuclear mission. (In fact, the service is due to release its nuclear roadmap any day now.) The new office will incorporate the functions currently exercised by the directorate of nuclear operations, plans, and requirements under the Air Staff's A3/A5 hierarchy. That office was itself a relatively new creation, having been established in February. The Air Force has not yet announced who will lead A10, but a likely candidate is Maj. Gen. Donald Alston, current head of the nuclear operations, plans and requirements directorate.
 
10/23/2008 
Verbatim

No Dog, Just Concern
"You know it concerns me that we keep hearing, 'Well this is something that the military doesn't want. They didn't ask for,' and all that. Then I go over there [Southwest Asia theater], and that's not their attitude at all. They have needs over there. Our lift capacity is in dire straights. … Now on the F-22—just yesterday we read about the T-50 … a fifth generation [fighter] that the Russians have. … I'm concerned about this. And I guess, you know, if we're down to 187 F-22s, and I think out of that only—what 120 are actually combat ready and used for combat. … I look at our committee—the Senate Armed Services Committee—and on these two vehicles I mentioned—the F-22 and the C-17—in Oklahoma. I don't have a dog in that fight. We don't have any parochial interest there. But it's the capability that we're going to need."
—Sen. James Inhofe (R-Okla.), speaking during the Senate Armed Services Committee hearing on the Fiscal 2011 defense budget, Feb. 2, 2010.

Verbatim

Taming Expectations
"Every QDR disappoints those who look for radical reallocation of resources. The current fiscal environment is compounding that trend."
—Jim Thomas, vice president for studies at the Center for Strategic and Budgetary Assessments, briefing reporters in Washington, D.C., Jan. 26, 2010. 

Sponsored Links

airforce-magazine.com material is under copyright by the Air Force Association. All rights reserved.

The Air Force Association, 1501 Lee Highway, Arlington,VA 22209-1198