Sign In
Airforce-Magazine.com: Online journal of the Air Force Association
Article Collections
Editorials
Airpower Classics
Perspectives (Articles by Topic)
Verbatim
The Chart Page
The Keeper File
Valor
Enola Gay Controversy
Advertising
Media Kit
Print Advertising
Online Advertising
 
Send Letter to Editor
Reprint Permission
About Us
Subscription Manager
How to Join AFA

Gates Hits Reset Button on CSAR-X 

Gates Hits Reset Button on CSAR-X: Among the victims of Defense Secretary Robert Gates’ program killing spree Monday was the Air Force’s combat search and rescue aircraft (dubbed CSAR-X), the planned replacement for the elderly HH-60 Pave Hawk helicopter. The CSAR-X program has had until now a “troubled acquisition history,” Gates said during his press conference. He said, too, that there is a “fundamental question of whether this important mission can only be accomplished by yet another single-service solution, with a single-purpose aircraft.” Gates said DOD would take another look at the requirements behind the program and develop a more “sustainable approach” on a reboot of the effort. The relook would determine whether there is a requirement for a “specialized” CSAR aircraft or whether it should be a “joint capability,” he said. Before Gates’ announcement, the Air Force was poised to award the CSAR-X contract later this year, believing that it had resolved the issues that had derailed the original source-selection in November 2006. Gates comments echo the criticisms of outgoing DOD weapons czar John Young, who said last fall that he wouldn’t just “automatically rubber stamp” the CSAR-X requirement. (For more on Young’s questioning the CSAR-X requirement, read The John Young View.)
—Marc V. Schanz 
4/7/2009 
Verbatim

No Dog, Just Concern
"You know it concerns me that we keep hearing, 'Well this is something that the military doesn't want. They didn't ask for,' and all that. Then I go over there [Southwest Asia theater], and that's not their attitude at all. They have needs over there. Our lift capacity is in dire straights. … Now on the F-22—just yesterday we read about the T-50 … a fifth generation [fighter] that the Russians have. … I'm concerned about this. And I guess, you know, if we're down to 187 F-22s, and I think out of that only—what 120 are actually combat ready and used for combat. … I look at our committee—the Senate Armed Services Committee—and on these two vehicles I mentioned—the F-22 and the C-17—in Oklahoma. I don't have a dog in that fight. We don't have any parochial interest there. But it's the capability that we're going to need."
—Sen. James Inhofe (R-Okla.), speaking during the Senate Armed Services Committee hearing on the Fiscal 2011 defense budget, Feb. 2, 2010.

Verbatim

Taming Expectations
"Every QDR disappoints those who look for radical reallocation of resources. The current fiscal environment is compounding that trend."
—Jim Thomas, vice president for studies at the Center for Strategic and Budgetary Assessments, briefing reporters in Washington, D.C., Jan. 26, 2010. 

Sponsored Links

airforce-magazine.com material is under copyright by the Air Force Association. All rights reserved.

The Air Force Association, 1501 Lee Highway, Arlington,VA 22209-1198