Sign In
Airforce-Magazine.com: Online journal of the Air Force Association
Article Collections
Editorials
Airpower Classics
Perspectives (Articles by Topic)
Verbatim
The Chart Page
The Keeper File
Valor
Enola Gay Controversy
Advertising
Media Kit
Print Advertising
Online Advertising
 
Send Letter to Editor
Reprint Permission
About Us
Subscription Manager
How to Join AFA

Bomber Musings 

Bomber Musings: In the upcoming quadrennial defense review, the health of the industrial base will be a factor in how to proceed with the next Air Force bomber program, Air Force Chief of Staff Gen. Norton Schwartz said April 16. “Keeping design teams together is a matter that the department needs to consider,” Schwartz told an audience during a National Aeronautic Association luncheon in Washington, D.C. He said the QDR will also examine what range, payload, “duration,” and “observability characteristics” will be needed from a new bomber, as well as whether it will be manned or unmanned, and whether it should be nuclear-capable or not. Defense Secretary Robert Gates earlier in the month had announced the delay to the start of the bomber program, and, the day before the address by Schwartz said the future bomber will also be shaped by the results of the post-START nuclear reduction talks with Russia. If deployed nuclear weapons levels go down significantly, “the question is whether the traditional triad makes sense anymore,” Gates said in his remarks at Air University at Maxwell AFB, Ala., (thereby implying that continuance of the nuclear bomber leg might be re-examined.) And, “maybe a manned bomber isn't the answer” when mulling future long-range strike, given the advent of long-endurance, armed unmanned aerial vehicles like the MQ-9 Reaper, he said. (For more Daily Report coverage on the Schwartz luncheon, read The Military Requirement is 243.) (Full transcript of Gates at AU)
—John A. Tirpak and Michael C. Sirak 
4/20/2009 
Verbatim

No Dog, Just Concern
"You know it concerns me that we keep hearing, 'Well this is something that the military doesn't want. They didn't ask for,' and all that. Then I go over there [Southwest Asia theater], and that's not their attitude at all. They have needs over there. Our lift capacity is in dire straights. … Now on the F-22—just yesterday we read about the T-50 … a fifth generation [fighter] that the Russians have. … I'm concerned about this. And I guess, you know, if we're down to 187 F-22s, and I think out of that only—what 120 are actually combat ready and used for combat. … I look at our committee—the Senate Armed Services Committee—and on these two vehicles I mentioned—the F-22 and the C-17—in Oklahoma. I don't have a dog in that fight. We don't have any parochial interest there. But it's the capability that we're going to need."
—Sen. James Inhofe (R-Okla.), speaking during the Senate Armed Services Committee hearing on the Fiscal 2011 defense budget, Feb. 2, 2010.

Verbatim

Taming Expectations
"Every QDR disappoints those who look for radical reallocation of resources. The current fiscal environment is compounding that trend."
—Jim Thomas, vice president for studies at the Center for Strategic and Budgetary Assessments, briefing reporters in Washington, D.C., Jan. 26, 2010. 

Sponsored Links

airforce-magazine.com material is under copyright by the Air Force Association. All rights reserved.

The Air Force Association, 1501 Lee Highway, Arlington,VA 22209-1198