Sign In
Airforce-Magazine.com: Online journal of the Air Force Association
Article Collections
Editorials
Airpower Classics
Perspectives (Articles by Topic)
Verbatim
The Chart Page
The Keeper File
Valor
Enola Gay Controversy
Advertising
Media Kit
Print Advertising
Online Advertising
 
Send Letter to Editor
Reprint Permission
About Us
Subscription Manager
How to Join AFA

High Risk 

High Risk: Air Combat Command boss Gen. John Corley declared in a June 9 letter to Sen. Saxby Chambliss (R-Ga.) that, in his opinion, a fleet of 187 F-22s puts execution of the current national military strategy "at high risk in the near to mid-term." In a June 8 letter to Corley, Chambliss had asked for his "personal and/or professional assessment of the risk." Top Air Force leaders have characterized the risk as moderate to high. In his letter, Corley stated that ACC still holds to "the need for 381 F-22s to deliver a tailored package of air superiority to our combatant commanders and provide a potent, globally arrayed, asymmetric deterrent against potential adversaries." Corley also said he was not aware of any studies "that demonstrate 187 F-22s are adequate to support our national military strategy." He said the Office of the Secretary of Defense “did not solicit direct input” from ACC, but the command worked closely with USAF headquarters to ensure that ACC’s views were available. He added that ACC analysis, done in concert with Headquarters Air Force, “shows a moderate risk force can be obtained with an F-22 fleet of approximately 250 aircraft.” A number that is somewhat higher than the Air Force's current stated military requirement. Corley acknowledged the “tough choices” that must be made in balancing warfighting needs against fiscal realities.
 
6/17/2009 
Verbatim

No Dog, Just Concern
"You know it concerns me that we keep hearing, 'Well this is something that the military doesn't want. They didn't ask for,' and all that. Then I go over there [Southwest Asia theater], and that's not their attitude at all. They have needs over there. Our lift capacity is in dire straights. … Now on the F-22—just yesterday we read about the T-50 … a fifth generation [fighter] that the Russians have. … I'm concerned about this. And I guess, you know, if we're down to 187 F-22s, and I think out of that only—what 120 are actually combat ready and used for combat. … I look at our committee—the Senate Armed Services Committee—and on these two vehicles I mentioned—the F-22 and the C-17—in Oklahoma. I don't have a dog in that fight. We don't have any parochial interest there. But it's the capability that we're going to need."
—Sen. James Inhofe (R-Okla.), speaking during the Senate Armed Services Committee hearing on the Fiscal 2011 defense budget, Feb. 2, 2010.

Verbatim

Taming Expectations
"Every QDR disappoints those who look for radical reallocation of resources. The current fiscal environment is compounding that trend."
—Jim Thomas, vice president for studies at the Center for Strategic and Budgetary Assessments, briefing reporters in Washington, D.C., Jan. 26, 2010. 

Sponsored Links

airforce-magazine.com material is under copyright by the Air Force Association. All rights reserved.

The Air Force Association, 1501 Lee Highway, Arlington,VA 22209-1198