Sign In
Airforce-Magazine.com: Online journal of the Air Force Association
Article Collections
Editorials
Airpower Classics
Perspectives (Articles by Topic)
Verbatim
The Chart Page
The Keeper File
Valor
Enola Gay Controversy
Advertising
Media Kit
Print Advertising
Online Advertising
 
Send Letter to Editor
Reprint Permission
About Us
Subscription Manager
How to Join AFA

Force-Cut Reality Has Sunk In 

—Tamar A. Mehuron

Sept. 26, 2006—Lt. Gen. Roger Brady, the Air Force's top personnel officer, describes the impending personnel cuts in terms of the development challenges facing USAF. He told attendees Tuesday at AFA's Air & Space Conference in Washington that there are three jobs: Job #1 is to win the war on terrorism; job #2 is to develop and take care of the service's airmen; job #3 is to modernize and recapitalize equipment. Here is the crunch: The money to recapitalize will come from cutting 40,000 personnel over the next three years.

“We’re about halfway through the pissed off stage” in terms of the drawdowns, said Brady. He explained that USAF cut 30,000 two years ago, another 20,000 this year, and expects to cut 15,000 in 2007 under the accelerated reduction plan. "We’re at 350,000, we’re going to 316,000 airmen," said Brady.

"I’m confident we will do this and make this work," he added, but he said that his biggest concern is that the service hasn't cut enough from headquarters. Instead, he said: "We ripped the hell out of the wings. At the wing level, we’ve got more folks doing ancillary duties than primary duties.”

Brady acknowledged that the some areas, such as manpower and personnel, took huge hits. However, he said USAF is keeping an eye on capabilities. In personnel offices, he said, “We have a heavy footprint back here that is not forward deployed. So we tried to tap various tools such as reachback, use of the Web, etc., to deal with these cuts” while still retaining capability.

Even with the drawdown in personnel, Brady said that the Air Force does not envision reducing the operations tempo. However, he noted that “USAF’s skirts are not all clean” in this regard, because some fields, such as security forces, are heavily tasked, while others are less so.

Within some fields, only 40 percent of those available have deployed, while 20 percent have deployed twice. "We are incredibly stressed in pockets," admitted Brady, adding, "I don’t think we’re using our people as effectively as we could.”

Verbatim

To Be Clear
“Just like in my business, the issues that go badly get all of the attention. I think, to be clear with you, there are many things that are managed well every day in the Air Force.”
—John Young, Pentagon acquisition executive, speaking to defense reporters on the state of Air Force acquisition, Washington, D.C., Nov. 20, 2008.

Verbatim

F-22 Options
“They have two choices. On January 21st, they can obligate the $90 million and decide there's some chance ... that they will buy the airplanes and they'd rather preserve the option to buy [them] at no additional cost to the taxpayer. Or, they could chose not to obligate the $90 million and accept that they still have a decision to be made between then and March 1st. But that decision may cost the taxpayer more money.”
—DOD acquisition czar John Young on how releasing only $50 million of the $140 million authorized by Congress to keep the F-22 production line active until March 2009 still preserves options for the new Administration, Capitol Hill, Nov. 19, 2008.

Sponsored Links

airforce-magazine.com material is under copyright by the Air Force Association. All rights reserved.

The Air Force Association, 1501 Lee Highway, Arlington,VA 22209-1198