Sign In
Airforce-Magazine.com: Online journal of the Air Force Association
Article Collections
Editorials
Airpower Classics
Perspectives (Articles by Topic)
Verbatim
The Chart Page
The Keeper File
Valor
Enola Gay Controversy
Advertising
Media Kit
Print Advertising
Online Advertising
 
Send Letter to Editor
Reprint Permission
About Us
Subscription Manager
How to Join AFA

Enola Gay Archive 

The Enola Gay and the Smithsonian

   

After "The Last Act" With Martin Harwit gone, the museum displayed the Enola Gay's forward fuselage, a propeller, and other components in a depoliticized exhibit.  It drew four million visitors, the most ever for a special exhibit.  (NASM photo by Carolyn Russo)

 

In 1994, the National Air and Space Museum and its parent organization, the Smithsonian Institution, planned to exhibit the Enola Gay, the B-29 that dropped the atomic bomb on Hiroshima, as a prop in a political horror show.  It would have depicted Japan more as the victim instead of the aggressor in World War II.

However, the museum's plans were revealed by Air Force Magazine, the journal of the Air Force Association.  A raging controversy ensued, and in response to public and Congressional outrage, the political exhibition was canceled in 1995 and the museum director was fired.

The Smithsonian Institution replaced the original exhibition with a straightforward program that eventually became the most popular exhibition in the museum's history.

The controversy never died.  Books and articles continue to appear, many of them written by people who have not bothered to check the facts.

Here are the contemporary articles, reports, and documents - drawn upon by all parties to the controversy - that were the raw materials for the argument in 1994 and 1995.

Here also is the complete report, "The Smithsonian and the Enola Gay," published by the Air Force Association in April 2004.


Chronology of the Controversy


Revisionism Gone Wrong

A collection of Air Force Association reports, analyses and articles, ranging from March 1994 to December 1996 --

Part 1    Special reports and analyses

Part 2    Articles and editorials


The Airplane

The Crew

The Atom Bomb

The Mission

Recommended Reading and Web Site Links

Frequently Asked Questions

Verbatim
Bring More
“Everyone … was so ecstatic or excited to have us there on the ground. … [In broken English, they appeared to say] ‘Please bring more; please bring more.’ … Offload capability is very limited. … [The C-130 had] to be hand-offloaded. … Based on what I saw, I really don’t think they have the infrastructure. … It would take a lot of people and resources to distribute it [relief and medical supplies] needs to be distributed.”
—USAF Capt. Trevor Hall, command pilot for the C-130 that delivered the first US supplies to Burma following the devastating May 2 cyclone, speaking with reporters May 14.
Verbatim

Dollars Well Spent
“Sometimes Congress has a long-range, wiser process than the military ... because we have the opportunity to look at national defense from a broader point of view than just a single service. ... How about the A-10? The Air Force didn’t want it, and they have gotten more than their money’s worth out of the A-10 in the Middle East.”
—Rep. Ike Skelton (D-Mo.), chairman of the House Armed Services Committee, commenting on whether unwanted Congressional plus-ups in the Defense Department budget place more budgetary pressures on the Pentagon, during a meeting with defense reporters in Washington, D.C., April 29, 2008.

Sponsored Links

airforce-magazine.com material is under copyright by the Air Force Association. All rights reserved.

The Air Force Association, 1501 Lee Highway, Arlington,VA 22209-1198