Sign In
Airforce-Magazine.com: Online journal of the Air Force Association
Article Collections
Editorials
Airpower Classics
Perspectives (Articles by Topic)
Verbatim
The Chart Page
The Keeper File
Valor
Enola Gay Controversy
Advertising
Media Kit
Print Advertising
Online Advertising
 
Send Letter to Editor
Reprint Permission
About Us
Subscription Manager
How to Join AFA

Risky Business 

 

June 29, 2009—The Pentagon has embarked on "extremely risky" business in its concurrent development and production plan for the F-35 Lightning II Joint Strike Fighter, according to the Government Accountability Office. The GAO notes in recent Congressional testimony that DOD had completed only about two percent of the new fighter's development flight testing as of late fall 2008 and does not plan to have a fully integrated, mission-capable aircraft enter flight testing until 2012, at which time it would have procured 183 production aircraft. Under current plans, DOD would buy 273 airframes before it completes development flight testing. DOD is relying on lab, flying test bed, and subject-matter analysis to verify the aircraft's capabilities vs. actual flight testing—83 percent vs. 17 percent as shown in the graph—but the Congressional watchdog agency notes that although simulation labs have improved greatly, "their ability to substitute for flight testing has not yet been demonstrated." And, GAO states, "The sheer complexity of the JSF program—with 22.9 million lines of software code, three variants, and multi-mission development—suggests the aircraft will encounter many unforeseen problems during flight testing requiring additional time in the schedule for rework." GAO also noted that development costs are still going up and the end date for development extended. As a result, lawmakers have cast a wary eye at DOD plans to try to accelerate JSF production to fill the US military's approaching fighter gap.

Source: "Joint Strike Fighter: Strong Risk Management Essential as Program Enters Most Challenging Phase," testimony by Michael Sullivan, Director, Acquisition and Sourcing Management, The Government Accountability Office, May 20, 2009.

Verbatim

Preemptive Action
"Since the [Defense] Department's acceptance of the independent estimates last fall, we've been, in just about every respect, acting as if the program were in a Nunn-McCurdy breach. ... We've been taking all of the mitigating and corrective action that we would take as if there were a Nunn-McCurdy breach."
—Air Force Secretary Michael Donley, discussing with reporters the restructure of the F-35 strike fighter program announced in February 2010 and the probability that the program will soon exceed Nunn-McCurdy cost-monitoring thresholds that would necessitate, per US law, a program review and corrective steps, Washington, D.C., March 2, 2010. 

Verbatim

Message for Grandma
"She has working for her as a citizen in the United States an Air Force Reserve that has some very talented, capable, patriotic, and willing individuals doing the business to keep this nation free. Just like her generation—the 'Greatest Generation'—was, I am very proud of the folks that we have got. If not the second greatest, then they are an extension of the greatest generation and they are ready, willing, and able to do the things that she would want them to do to make sure we keep our freedoms."
—Lt. Gen. Charles Stenner, Air Force Reserve chief, responding to a reporter's question on what the reporter should tell his 85-year-old grandmother to convey to her the importance of Air Force Reservists to the nation's security, Orlando, Fla., Feb. 19, 2010.

 

Sponsored Links

airforce-magazine.com material is under copyright by the Air Force Association. All rights reserved.

The Air Force Association, 1501 Lee Highway, Arlington,VA 22209-1198